“UC Protesters Return to Wheeler Hall” – The Daily Planet

From the Berkeley Daily Planet:

By: Raymond Barglow

Having barricaded themselves in Wheeler Hall on Nov. 20, on the last day of a three-day strike, UC Berkeley students who oppose cuts to public education in California returned to Wheeler Monday night, Dec. 7.

But this time they said that they were appropriating the space for educational purposes rather than “occupying” it. The avowed intention of the protesters this week is to show that the university should rightfully be governed and run by those whom it directly affects: the students who learn in it, the faculty who teach in it, and the staff who provide services and maintenance.

This campus community has “shown the world that we can shut this university down,” the protest announcement says. “Now, we show that we can run our public university the way it should be—by the public.” The current aim is to transform Wheeler Hall into a “24-hour open university” during a week on campus that has traditionally been called “dead week”—a time at the end of the school term when students prepare to take their final examinations and hand in their term papers.

This most recent action began on the steps of Wheeler at 2:30 p.m. That evening, Professor Meister from UC Santa Cruz addressed the students in Wheeler auditorium. He talked about the way that UC is representing its financial situation to the world, “The administration is telling us that the problem is so big, so determined by global factors, that nothing can be done.”

Meister says, though, that research he and other faculty have done into university finances indicates that the crisis has been manufactured by the UC Regents themselves, and that there is no assurance that revenue from the hikes in student fees will be used to restore classes, jobs, or services that have recently been eliminated. On the contrary, says Meister, student fees may be used to securitize bonds that will pay for the future construction of new buildings.

In his talk to the students in Wheeler, Meister said that UC is adopting the pricing model of private universities: education will be a commodity purchasable on the market like any other. But what this means, in Meister’s view, is that UC’s Master Plan will abandon its commitment to affordability. The university has never fully lived up to that commitment, he points out, but now it proposes to repudiate it entirely. Only students who are wealthy enough to pay for their own education will receive one, Meister says. As at Stanford, so at UC.

Meister sees a possible solution in the raising of taxes on California’s highest income earners. The barrier to doing this, he says, is political: “Those 2 to 3 percent of the population run things in California. They are also the people who contribute disproportionally to political campaigns, and they are represented on the Board of Regents.

Meister issued a challenge to advocates of public higher education, asking them to democratize the regents, to make the university’s finances transparent, and to restore public trust that the university will serve all Californians. “I do not think that there can be higher taxation without higher trust,” Meister said. “One of the problems of UC is that is that it has lost public trust … . Unless UC is accountable for its own money, it cannot ask the public for more support.”

Following Meister’s talk, those inside Wheeler auditorium were ordered by UC police to leave. The group discussed whether or not to comply with this demand, and voted to stay. A widely shared sentiment was that “This building is really our building—it should serve those of us being educated, not the police or the administration—so we should be able to remain here.”

Near midnight on Monday, the police backed down on their threat to take action against the students, and so about 70 of them bedded down for the night in the space that they are calling an “open university.” They invite the entire university community to share this space with them, and they intend to hold it open 24 hours a day, Monday through Friday of this week.

Tuesday, December 8th, 2009 communiques

2 Comments to “UC Protesters Return to Wheeler Hall” – The Daily Planet

Brian Pujanauski
December 8, 2009

“The avowed intention of the protesters this week is to show that the university should rightfully be governed and run by those whom it directly affects: the students who learn in it, the faculty who teach in it, and the staff who provide services and maintenance.”

This strikes me as the same sort of argument that a 16 year-old uses when they don’t like the rules of parents. Which is all well and good, but the parents are the ones providing the money. Accept the money, accept the rules. Even with the drastic cuts made by the state government, the UC system still receives a great deal of money from the state, and it’s foolish to think that the state should have no say in how that money is spent.

Meister’s call for transparency is important. It’s hard to be swayed by a plea for more money when there’s little information about how the current funds are spent. I think he’s wrong though that higher taxes on the top 2-3% is the answer. California already has one of the most progressive tax-schemes in the country, and it causes huge boom and bust revenue numbers. Exacerbating that fact is not the answer.

Mark Nolan
December 8, 2009

I’d be interested to hear you explain how progressive rather than regressive tax structures encourage boom/bust cycles… And we need to look at “progressive” in comparison with other countries… not just the U.S. I believe top marginal rates used to be over 90 percent under Eisenhower. Now they are like 35…

Leave a comment

 

RSS@ucbprotest